In this story:
“Diebold Election Systems President Tom Swidarski defended his technology Tuesday as the safest, ‘most advanced out there.’ He dismissed the Hopkins study as a ‘homework assignment’ by a bunch of graduate students aimed as a ‘misguided,’ personal attack’ on his company.
Swidarski called computer science election watchdogs such as those gathered in Denver this week ‘fringe organizations’ ‘without much real practical knowledge of the election process.'”
This is a very odd statement coming from the president of a company that would MAKE MORE MONEY if they sold an add-on device to print voter-verifiable ballots! Why on earth is he opposing this add-on sale?