Why are Republicans still stonewalling the 9/11 Commission?
Again, for the hundredth time, what are they hiding?
I have a suspicion that I’ll go ahead and share. I suspect that somewhere in the President’s Daily Briefing (probably on different days in August) an analyst mentioned a concern about hijacking and domestic terrorism by al-Qaeda — maybe even going so far as to suggest that targets like the World Trade Center would be vulnerable.
I doubt that the analyst who prepared the briefing connected the concern over hijackings and a heightened threat of domestic terrorism but they probably suggested both of these as potential concerns.
I also now suspect that someone suggested to the president that he increase the security at airports but W couldn’t be bothered because he some brush to clear or a golf game to go to or some other pressing engagement during his month-long vacation in August of 2001.
Furthermore, don’t you find the insistance that the president actually wants the commission’s work to continue for the two months but can’t seem to get Hastert to go along, a bit too convenient? I mean, heck folks, who really believes that little cover story?
And also, why just an hour with the commission, Mr. Bush? Here’s a question from today’s gaggle that really shows that some in the press recognize the president’s hypocrisy on this issue:
In every speech he gives, President Bush invokes the atrocities of 9/11 and he talks about how that event has impressed on him a determination to always honor the victims of those atrocities in his daily conduct of his office. And I wonder if you could explain with some serious Texan straight talk here, Scott, how it is honoring the victims of 9/11 to restrict the questioning of the President on this subject to one hour?
How about it, Mr. President?
Answer that question for us all please.