Regular readers of STF are aware that some warmonger whacko who calls himself Confederate Yankee accused Dave of treason for criticizing Bush’s immoral war in Iraq. At the end of his dogmatic screed against political dissent and the Constitution Confederate Yankee links to another fascist over at The Jawa Report, who calls himself Dr. Rusty Shackleford, and accuses Markos of treason.
Confederate Yankee stated the basis for his and Shackleford’s condemnation of critics of Bush’s war as traitor:
One man’s dissent can very well be another man’s treason. With that you should not disagree.
Confederate Fascist should have added, “And in addition to unilaterally deciding who is guilty of treason, I decide which facts are admissible evidence.” This is the error message I got from Confederate Fascist’s site when I tried to post a response, before I was banned for disagreeing with the reactionary opinions of Confederate Fascist and Old Soldier:
Your comment could not be submitted due to questionable content: news.independent.co.uk
Isn’t that interesting? I wonder what other sources of factual information Confederate Fascist does not accept?