Revived Asian-Donations Smear On Clinton

By Dave Johnson and James Boyce
The right is reviving the 90s Asian-donations smear on the Clintons.
Headlined at the Drudge Report, the Wall Street Journal has Big Source of Clinton’s Cash Is an Unlikely Address,

It isn’t obvious how the Paw family is able to afford such political largess. …

Did you ask them? Is it your business? Actually they did ask them,

But he added: “I have been fortunate in my investments and all of my contributions have been my money.”

But they have a Chinese name, so let’s do a big story on it.

The Paws’ political donations closely track donations made by Norman Hsu, a wealthy New York businessman in the apparel industry who once listed the Paw home as his address, according to public records. Mr. Hsu is one of the top fund-raisers for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign.

And now we get to the root of the big scandal – (queue horror-movie music) Someone is CHINESE-American!

William and Alice Paw are of Chinese descent..

That’s the whole story. There are no accusations of any wrongdoing. Just that a family with a Chinese name gave a lot of money to the Clintons.
In the 1990s the Republicans ran a smear campaign for years, accusing the Clintons of passing nuclear-weapons secrets to China in exchange for campaign donations. There was never anything to back it up, of course, but the racial hatred aspect got them votes. It plays big in the South, I guess.
In case people don’t get it, the right’s echo chamber cranks up the noise. No subtle implications need apply: Laundering for Hillary?

The little green house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. in Daly City, Calif., (shown right) may spell big trouble for Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York as she pursues the presidency.

And there they go again. The Republicans are gearing up the smear and race-hatred campaign early this time.

5 thoughts on “Revived Asian-Donations Smear On Clinton

  1. I read this this morning and it still burns me up. I can not believe that in 2007, the WSJ thinks it’s perfectly fine to run an article like this. It’s insulting, demeaning and racist. Makes me glad I’m not a sumscriber.

  2. Yep–it’s all the fault of those right-wing bigots:
    Democratic fundraiser is a fugitive in plain sight
    By Chuck Neubauer and Robin Fields, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers
    August 29, 2007
    California authorities have sought businessman Norman Hsu for 15 years. Since 2004, he has carved out a place of honor raising cash for such candidates as Hillary Rodham Clinton.
    By Chuck Neubauer and Robin Fields, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers
    August 29, 2007
    WASHINGTON — For the last 15 years, California authorities have been trying to figure out what happened to a businessman named Norman Hsu, who pleaded no contest to grand theft, agreed to serve up to three years in prison and then seemed to vanish.
    “He is a fugitive,” Ronald Smetana, who handled the case for the state attorney general, said in an interview. “Do you know where he is?”
    Hsu, it seems, has been hiding in plain sight, at least for the last three years.
    Since 2004, one Norman Hsu has been carving out a prominent place of honor among Democratic fundraisers. He has funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions into party coffers, much of it earmarked for presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.
    In addition to making his own contributions, Hsu has honed the practice of assembling packets of checks from contributors who bear little resemblance to the usual Democratic deep pockets: A self-described apparel executive with a variety of business interests, Hsu has focused on delivering hefty contributions from citizens who live modest lives and are neophytes in the world of campaign giving.
    Hillary is even giving the money back. Or is she?
    The New York Times neglects to mention the actual amounts that Hsu redirected to Hillary’s coffers. The Paw family alone gave $55,000 over the last three years to Hillary’s campaigns, bundled through Hsu. The Lee family in New York donated over $37,000 to Hillary through Hsu as well, for a total just shy of six figues. The charitable donations to which Hillary has committed amounts to 25% of Hsu’s bundled donations from just the two families reported by the LAT.
    Why not part with all of it? She’s been raising at least 1000 times the amount of her divestment in each of the last two quarters. While she will certainly need the money, clearing her name should take a higher priority. Quarter-measures like this make her look as though she’s only interested in token actions meant to take the heat off for just long enough to keep as much Hsu money as she can.
    Beyond Hillary’s peculiar pecunary posturing, the path of Norman Hsu seems rather amusing. The man convicted of fraud and wanted for fleeing his prison sentence did not seem unduly handicapped by either in his career. The famous liberal New School made him a trustee and became a trustee at its Eugene Lang College. That came after he started donating heavily to the Democratic Party in his new incarnation, and the failed businessman and convicted fraudster somehow generated large amounts of cash for these efforts, with “connections” (as the New York Times puts it) to clothing related businesses. None of these organizations ever did as much as a cursory check on the Hong Kong native.
    Where did Hsu get all this money? That remains to be seen, and it may be the most interesting question yet. So far, his entire history has been one failed enterprise after another — and yet as a fugitive on the run, he managed to manipulate millions of dollars for the Democrats. That’s a pretty neat trick.
    “Revived Asian-Donations Smear On Clinton”, from “The reality based” community. What a laugh.


    Because of the hysteria in the blogosphere I am reposting this post that I wrote in August:A recent post I wrote with James, defending Hillary from a racist Republican attack, has evoked e-mail and comment “accusations” that I am a…

Comments are closed.