Did Spitting ‘Victim’ from DC Protest Cry Wolf?

This piece was first published at AlterNet. This post is revised and extended from that piece.
The media interest surrounding Private Joshua Sparling’s claim that he was spit at during the Washington, DC protest merits skepticism considering that his previous claims of victimhood have turned out inaccurate, and that he’s been a frequent associate of right-wing figures such as Sean Hannity and Oliver North.
There is a conventional wisdom that Vietnam War protesters included fringe elements who did uncivil things, including spitting at soldiers returning from Vietnam. Evidence of this belief in the mainstream media appeared as recently as early this month in Newsweek earlier this month wrote,,

Returning [Vietnam] GIs were sometimes jeered and even spat upon in airports; they learned to change quickly into civilian clothes.

Decades later, little has changed. With the headline “SPITTING MATCH WITH DISABLED VET…” the Drudge Report on Monday linked to New York Times coverage of the weekend marches against President Bush’s Iraq “surge” plan to escalate the war. The story, Protest Focuses on Iraq Troop Increase, included the following:

There were a few tense moments, however, including an encounter involving Joshua Sparling, 25, who was on crutches and who said he was a corporal with the 82nd Airborne Division and lost his right leg below the knee in Ramadi, Iraq. Mr. Sparling spoke at a smaller rally held earlier in the day at the United States Navy Memorial, and voiced his support for the administration’s policies in Iraq.
Later, as antiwar protesters passed where he and his group were standing, words were exchanged and one of the antiwar protestors spit at the ground near Mr. Sparling; he spit back.

Wow — those horrible “antiwar protesters” are still at it! And what unspoken message is sent by this? That “antiwar protesters” are such terrible people, doing such terrible things.

But as it happens, Joshua Sparling has turned up time and time again in the news, in stories claiming he has been spat at by – and even received death threats from – left-wing “antiwar protesters.”
At the site The Left Coaster, blogger Mary wrote,

It seems he is the scapegoat for those who hate Bush’s war and he is condemned to live in a Twilight Zone world where he experiences all the outrages that were visited on vets during the Vietnam War. Whenever the wacko warhawks need to display a victim of the American people’s disdain for the war, he is hauled out to take another one for the team.

Joshua Sparling first appeared in the news in a United States Military Academy Public Affairs reference, in an August 8, 2005 story quoted cited by the West Point “public affairs” (PR) office, Future Plebes Learn Crafts Of War,

Last week, as a machine gun fired blanks in the distance … dodged from cover-to-cover as they ran the assault course, which teaches the cadets how to use grenades in combat.
82nd Pvt. Joshua Sparling was right behind them, offering advice the whole way.
“Always have two hands on your weapon. That way if you see anybody – boom, boom,” he yelled at Byrnes as she ran for cover, her M-16 flailing at her side. … “You have to keep down below that cover so you don’t get popped in the head,” Sparling yelled. Lin quickly tucked his head back behind the stump.

In December, 2005, as reported on the Fox News show Fox & Friends Sparling supposedly receives a Christmas card with a death threat,with a death threat Sparling claimed not to have kept the envelope, just the note inside. Sparling appears on Sean Hannity’s radio show to talk about this incident.
It turned out the card was sent by a white supremacist.
Sparling also found fame as a featured Republican guest at the 2006 State of the Union address, introduced by the GOP representative from his home district, Candice Miller:

“When I first spoke with Josh he told me how proud he was to provide security for the Iraqi election in October where he saw democracy take root. I thought it was only fitting that he come to see, in person, his Commander-In-Chief give an update on the war and watch our own democracy in action.”

Not long after this, Sparling was harassed by an antiwar and anti-military liberal at an airport,

… there was no wheel chair, no one at the SPIRIT counter and no security. … The security guard said, “You are no different than any other passenger with no boarding pass – no go.”
My son started to cry uncontrollably and told the guard to go to hell. Another lady spoke up and said, “That’s what you get for fighting in a war we have no business in.” Madder and very emotional I asked, “Can’t you remember 9-11?” She responded that was just our excuse to be in Iraq when we should not be there and we deserved whatever we got. That is when my son really lost it. Three WWII vets were coming off flights into DC, gave my son a hug, and stood up to the lady and security guard. They stayed with my son until he flew out.

Sparling has also appeared with Ollie North at “Freedom Alliance” rallies. (There is a picture of Sparling at one of these rallies, standing next to Ann Coulter.)
And, most recently, Sparling also appeared in an AP story about the weekend’s anti-war march, this time neglecting to mention the spitting incident,

About 40 people staged a counter-protest, including Army Cpl. Joshua Sparling, 25, who lost his leg to a bomb in Iraq.
He said the anti-war protesters, especially those who are veterans or who are on active duty, “need to remember the sacrifice we have made and what our fallen comrades would say if they were alive.”

(A YouTube video from the weekend march shows Sparling standing next to a sign that reads, “If Osama was a piece of ass, Clinton would have nailed him.”)
So the New York Times, Washington Post and others did not choose just any random Iraq war vet to interview. A Google search of “Joshua Sparling” yields 64,800 results.
And it is worth noting that the major media chose to cover this from the angle of “antiwar protesters spitting at veterans.” There was another story available. The marchers represented the views of, according to current polls, a majority of the American public. Joshua Sparling was part of a group that appeared to be attempting to provoke the crowd. A witness to the activities of Sparling’s group is quoted at Hughes for America, saying,

Shortly after the event began, I noticed Sparling and his small group – himself, a woman wearing the same 82nd Airborne sweatshirt and another young man – push their way to the front. … When everyone would cheer a particular speaker, he first stood out by loudly booing. … Sparling’s Freeper friends across the street had spent the better part of an hour holding up ridiculous signs like “Anti-American peaceniks think sedition is patriotic” and “We gave peace a chance. We got 9/11”. Also, they hung an effigy of Jane Fonda. These weren’t friendly people. They were people looking to provoke a response.
[…] Before I even noticed Sparling’s leg, I thought the kid was a right-wing plant in our group. I thought we were going to be marching, peacefully, and this kid would break a window or otherwise do something to make for an ugly scene, making what was actually a peaceful protest look anything but. It looked to me like he was taking great pains to stand out in what he was doing. … I can safely say Sparling and his group showed up looking to start something…

Given this account, one wonders why the media chose to write of Sparling as a victim of the crowd?
Finally, a look at larger historical question: were Vietnam Veterans spat at by “protesters?”
Mary’s Left Coaster blog post refers us to an article by Jerry Lembcke from 2005, Debunking a Spitting Image,

For a book I wrote in 1998 I looked back to the time when the spit was supposedly flying, the late 1960s and early 1970s. I found nothing. No news reports or even claims that someone was being spat on.
… A 1971 Harris poll conducted for the Veterans Administration found over 90 percent of Vietnam veterans reporting a friendly homecoming. Far from spitting on veterans, the antiwar movement welcomed them into its ranks and thousands of veterans joined the opposition to the war.
… Remembering the war in Vietnam through the images of betrayal is dangerous because it rekindles the hope that wars like it, in countries where we are not welcomed, can be won. It disparages the reputation of those who opposed that war and intimidates a new generation of activists now finding the courage to resist Vietnam-type ventures in the 21st century.

Where does this smear technique come from? What is gained by portraying veterans as victims of liberals spitting at them or harassing them? Perhaps a clue comes from the writings of Republican pundit David Horowitz. Horowitz writes that it is important to portray yourself as a victim, saying

“The stories work for you if you are the victim or if you are helping someone who is perceived to be a victim. Americans like heroes who care, and they identify with underdogs.”

Horowitz also advises Republicans,

“to manipulate the public’s feelings in support of your agenda, while mobilizing passions of fear and resentment against your opponent.”

Horowitz is not just any Republican pundit. John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton wrote about Horowitz’ influence in The War at Home,

“During the 2000 presidential and congressional elections, every Republican member of the U.S. Congress received a free pamphlet, compliments of Congressman Tom DeLay, the party’s majority whip. Written by conservative activist David Horowitz, the pamphlet was called The Art of Political War: How Republicans Can Fight to Win. It came with an endorsement on the cover by Karl Rove, the senior advisor to then-candidate George W. Bush.

Stories of victimhood such as Sparling’s come at a time when the White House is desperate to gain public support in its self-perceived war against those Americans who oppose their war policies.
Sparling’s claims might be more convincing if the media hadn’t interviewed the same veteran who was first introduced in stories where he was working with military “public affairs” professionals, then as a victim of a death threat in a Christmas card, then as a victim of an anti-war liberal in an airport, then as a favorite of the right-wing crazies who appear with Ollie North at pro-war rallies.

2 thoughts on “Did Spitting ‘Victim’ from DC Protest Cry Wolf?

  1. Did Spitting ‘Victim’ from DC Protest Cry Wolf?

    The Iraq war veteran who claims to have been spat at by "antiwar protesters" at this weekend’s DC march against Bush’s escalation appears to have a history of making such claims. And he appears to be a political operative.

  2. Thanks for writing this. So far as I remember, or ever heard of, there were no “spitting” incidents against Vietnam veterans. And, to the extent that the public did turn against them — let’s not deny that this happened — it wasn’t “dirty hippies” who made nasty remarks, but Mr. Average Citizen, usually in a business suit. I did witness some of that first hand, on a flight from NY to Detroit, sitting next to a Vietnam veteran, still in uniform, who had lost a foot and was on crutches. It was the businessmen on the flight who made nasty remarks, and included me in them because I was sitting next to the poor kid.
    It turned out that the kid lived in my neighborhood, and when we got off the plane we decided to take a cab together. No cab would pick up up, and cabbies certainly weren’t “dirty hippies.” I finally moved away from him, got a cab, and made the driver pick him up too and drive us to Ann Arbor.
    There was plenty of blaming the vets for having served in the war once it became unpopular, people remember this now, and what I’m hearing now is constant reminders that this must NOT happen again. I’m hearing this on the street, in the stores, every time the topic of the war comes up. It’s on the top of people’s minds, no matter how they feel about the war or how determined they are that the war should end. I don’t believe for a second that anybody’s going to spit at the Iraq veterans. They’re being seen as victims this time. There’s a lingering guilt about how the Vietnam vets were treated.

Comments are closed.